🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to erase African American heritage and experience from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the current situation of far-right rallies in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.